- Joined
- Apr 5, 2012
- Messages
- 1,772
- Reaction score
- 1,577
getting off topic. but agreed to all points above.
my original point is people in general follow where the money is at.
not everyone is about the money. if you love nephrology and dont care about the money, then do academic nephrology and have no regrets with your career.
there is no logical reason why anyone would do private practice nephrology unless this individual has an arrangement to try to make money
most PP nephrology jobs do not pay more than hospitalist when accounting for hours worked and days worked
the argument seems to be - if you can go to the rural areas you might get a good foothold in nephrology.
the counterargument is if you go to the rural areas, you could find a hospitalist job that works half the year and pays at a better rate than said nephrology job.
my original point is people in general follow where the money is at.
not everyone is about the money. if you love nephrology and dont care about the money, then do academic nephrology and have no regrets with your career.
there is no logical reason why anyone would do private practice nephrology unless this individual has an arrangement to try to make money
most PP nephrology jobs do not pay more than hospitalist when accounting for hours worked and days worked
the argument seems to be - if you can go to the rural areas you might get a good foothold in nephrology.
the counterargument is if you go to the rural areas, you could find a hospitalist job that works half the year and pays at a better rate than said nephrology job.